Forage Crops
Production Technology

DEPARTMENT OF PLANT & SOIL SCIENCES
DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES & NATURAL RESOURCES
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY


PT 2003-13

July 2003


ALFALFA VARIETIES FOR OKLAHOMA - 2003

John Caddel
Forage Extension Agronomist
Jay Prater
Senior Agriculturist
 

The choice of which variety to plant is an important question alfalfa producers must resolve before establishing new stands. Thousands of varieties have been developed during the last 40 years. The purpose of the Alfalfa Variety Evaluation Program at OSU is to help alfalfa producers decide which varieties to consider and to assist alfalfa breeders to choose which varieties to market in this area.

Normally 10 to 20 new alfalfas are submitted annually for testing in Oklahoma. We also include in these tests some varieties that are well tested to give a sound basis of comparison among varieties.

The table below summarizes data collected for many years (through plantings in 2001). Those wanting detailed information about alfalfa variety performance should visit http://alfalfa.okstate.edu/var-test/alf-var.html on the Internet. Currently, detailed results for the 1999-2002 harvest years in Oklahoma are available and can be printed from that site. If anyone desires older data, email the authors at john.caddel@okstate.edu

Varieties listed in Table 1 are well-tested. That is, they have been in several tests, representing diverse alfalfa production areas in the state. The more a variety is tested, the more confidence we have in its performance. Relative Yield is the relative ranking of a variety’s yield, compared to others in a particular test. A Relative Yield score of 100% indicates a variety’s yield performance is average among those in a test. The Minimum and Maximum relative yields indicate how widely a variety’s yield varies. All the varieties in Table 1 have produced yields well above average in test. The "Maximum" column shows how much above average each variety has yielded. Most have fallen below average one or more times. The column labeled "Minimum" shows the lowest relative yield we have recorded. When varieties are tested as much as OK 49 and Garst 630 (included as checks in many tests), there will be some failures.

 

Table 1. Performance summary of the proven varieties

 

Relative Yield

1st year

Number of

Average

Maximum

Minimum

tested

test-years

Magnum V

104.1

106.3

101.2

1998

16

OK 200

103.3

108.0

97.2

1996

36

Garst 630

102.6

110.6

93.2

1987

154

Garst 6420

102.1

110.6

95.5

1999

20

OK 49

101.7

110.7

93.3

1991

62

Magnum IV

101.1

106.3

93.9

1994

26

Garst 631

100.4

106.3

94.7

1996

39

Relative Yield is the relative ranking of a variety’s yield, compared to others in a particular test. A Relative Yield score of 100% indicates a variety’s yield performance is average among those in a test.

With very few exceptions varieties that perform well in "high yield" tests (deep fertility soil, irrigated), also perform well in other tests (moderate fertility, shallow soils, rainfed). We have checked to see if some varieties are only well suited for irrigated sites and others are only good in rainfed sites, but we have found no such trend in alfalfa.

Other good varieties are marketed in Oklahoma, but they have not been tested (for whatever reason) or have been in only one or two tests which is not good enough for us to "recommend" a variety. The varieties in Table 2 have been fairly well to very well tested, but may not be available. These tests include old alfalfas such as Oklahoma common and/or Buffalo. Otherwise few "bad" varieties are entered into our tests indicating that the competition among entries is keen.

Table 2. Varieties that show promise

Relative Yield

1st year

Number
of test-years

Average

Maximum

Minimum

tested

OK 199

102.7

106.0

96.1

1998

24

OK 169

103.7

110.6

100.0

2001

9

Reward

103.8

109.2

100.1

1996

32

Enhancer

103.0

106.8

100.2

1997

20

Abilene+Z

100.9

102.5

97.7

2000

12

 

Other Factors In Choosing Alfalfa Varieties

Disease and insect resistance along with winter hardiness are things that should be considered in addition to forage yield when purchasing a alfalfa seed. Disease and insect resistance scores and fall dormancy are available for several hundred alfalfa varieties at http://www.alfalfa.org/pdf/02ALFC011_variety_leaflet.pdf This information is compiled by The National Alfalfa Alliance (formerly the Alfalfa Council) from information supplied by the developers. Forage quality varies a little among alfalfa varieties, and timing of harvest is much more important than variety in determining forage quality.

 

Seed of Good Varieties is Expensive

To reduce establishment costs, try: 

  1. making a good seedbed;
  2. buying clean seed that has good germination; and 
  3. reducing planting rate to 10 to 12 pounds/acre. Buying "cheap" seed usually costs more from the
    standpoint of reduced yields, shorter stand life, increased insecticide. Establishing alfalfa is an investment.  Go with the best!!
     

Additional Information: Alfalfa forage yield for a particular variety varies from year to year and from one site to another; however, a variety's Forage Yield Score varies much less.  For this reason (and to conserve space), Forage Yield Scores are presented.  This is the total yield for a variety in a test divided by the average of all varieties in the test multiplied by 100.   Detailed yield data for each harvest in every trial are available from the authors for interested readers.

The information given herein is for educational purposes only. Reference made to commercial products or trade names is with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement is implied. Oklahoma State University does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, or status as a veteran in any of its policies, practices or procedures. Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sam E. Curl, Director of Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma. This publication is printed and issued by Oklahoma State University as authorized by the Dean of the Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources.


PT 2003-13

Page 2

July 2003