Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK | |
Oklahoma Alfalfa |
|
RELATIVE FEEDING VALUE (RFV), The best measure of the quality of a forage is animal productivity. Animal productivity is in turn affected by the intake and digestibility of the forage as well as the efficiency of utilization of the absorbed nutrients. Neutral-detergent-fiber (NDF) provides an estimate of forage intake, while acid-detergent-fiber (ADF) estimates forage digestibility. Crude protein is always of importance in cattle rations, especially dairy rations, because it is usually the highest priced nutrient. The principal forage analysis values used in ration formulations are: (1) protein; (2) ADF; and (3) NDF. These values are also used by hay buyers and sellers to estimate the feeding value of forages. Both buyers and sellers continue to look for a common means of estimating the quality of hay in terms of its value as a feed for livestock. RFV represents a single value that relates to the estimated quality of a forage as a livestock feed. The RFV has been used in certain hay areas of the U.S. more than in others. Relative Feed Value is a calculated value, utilizing ADF and NDF. It does not take into consideration the protein content of the forage. Protein level of the forage must be evaluated separately. Before RFV can be calculated, ADF and NDF must be used to calculate two other values. These values are Digestible Dry Matter and Dry Matter Intake. While different laboratories may use slightly different formulas to calculate these factors, the final estimated value are very similar. A forage with 28% ADF and 38% NDF will have about 67.1% Digestible Dry Matter and Dry Matter Intake of 3.15% of body weight. From this, the RFV equals 164. To establish a base-point that will enable one to better
determine just where an RFV rates on the quality scale, it can be noted that an ADF value
of 41% and an NDF of 53% would relate to a RFV of 100. The higher the RFV is above 100,
the higher quality of the forage. For example, alfalfa hay cut at full bloom would be
expected to have an RFV of 100. The following examples show the general relationships
among protein, ADF, NDF, and RFV. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional information:
Hay Judging. OSU Extension Facts F-2588 Collecting Forage Samples for Analysis. OSU Extension Facts
F-2589
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Curtis Richardson, Former Dairy Extension Department of Animal Science Oklahoma State University |